ACT Mission Viejo
United Nations

United Nations Launches Investigation of Human Rights Abuses

in the United States

2009 OCTOBER 24 - by Claude Cartaginese


      

For those of you who have never even heard of a “Special Rapporteur,” you may be surprised to find out that one has been appointed by the United Nations (UN), under a special mandate from the UN Human Rights Council (the successor to the corrupt and anti-Israel UN Commission on Human Rights), to open a probe—for the first time ever— into human rights violations by the United States because of a perception that there isn’t enough affordable public housing in urban areas.

Democracy Now!’s Amy Goodman reports that Raquel Rolnik, a Brazilian urban planner and the UN’s choice for the task, will be investigating issues of concern to the UN vis-à-vis the United States, including public housing, homelessness and foreclosures. As part of her fact-finding mission, she will visit New York City, Chicago, New Orleans, Los Angeles, Washington, a South Dakota Indian reservation, and Wilkes-Barre, Pa. She will then compile a report on her findings, which will be submitted to the UN General Assembly and the UN Human Rights Council in March.

The UN Human Rights Council believes that housing is a human right, and, because housing (especially “affordable housing”) is so tough to come by in places like New York City, there is a strong likelihood that the United States Government is guilty of gross human rights violations.

Now, having the UN send an investigator to the United States to report on “human rights violations” due to a perceived lack of housing availability—when it turns a blind eye to real human rights violations in places like Communist China, Sudan and Venezuela—should be enough to raise some eyebrows. But Rolnik’s impartiality is highly suspect, as she appears to have already made up her mind as to the existence of these “violations .”

Consider the following statements Rolnik made, before even beginning her “tour,” which have the same flavor as the Marxist rhetoric one is accustomed to hearing from Democracy Now!:

• [I am going to] hear the voices of those who are suffering on the ground.

•I am representing the right of adequate housing as a human right.

•Affordable housing here [in the United States] is not that affordable

•I see this mission as an opportunity to open a dialogue, to open a movement, towards the achievement and implementation of the right to adequate housing.

•We know very well that changes will come only if people organize.

The report will be bad. That is a foregone conclusion. How will the UN punish the United States? That remains to be seen. Who gave the UN the right to send a Special Rapporteur on this tour of American cities in the first place, since  UN Special Rapporteurs can only visit countries that have agreed to invite them?

The invitation came from the top.

http://newsrealblog.com/2009/10/24/united-nations-launches-investigation-of-human-rights-abuses-in-the-united-states/#more-12627



Banned UN Speech: Human Rights Nightmare (by Hillel Neuer) (hat tip Atlas Shrugs)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uhWgZu6tcZU&feature=channel_page

Hillel Neuer of UN Watch exposes the hypocrisy of the UN Human Rights Council (March 23, 2007). For the first time ever, the Council president, Ambassador Luis Alfonso de Alba of Mexico, rejects the speech as "inadmissible" and bans it from ever being delivered again.

"A diplomatic moment to remember..."
— New York Sun, March 30, 2007

"YouTube's Top Rated, Most Discussed, Most Linked, Most Viewed Video of the Week..."
— YouTube.com, March 2007

"Wow...a must see clip"
— Little Green Footballs blog

"Bloggers cheer. . . a stunning rebuke of the U.N. Human Rights Council"
— Slate.com

"Council President Luis Alfonso de Alba ruled the remarks inadmissible. . . in the depths of the U.N., this was of course logical: Mr. Neuer's commentary had been accurate..."
— Wall Street Journal


Hamas and Hezbollah are Enemies of Peace

UN Watch executive director Hillel Neuer addressed the Human Rights Council on its notorious Item 7: Human Rights Situation in Palestine and other occupied Arab territories. The debate, which resulted in the Council's 16th one-sided censure of Israel, continued the Council's selective and biased treatment of Israel.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M79zl7Qa_E0&feature=channel